Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe Hex
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 3.0 TH/s |
| 1,100 W | Power Consumption | 90 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 3.5 kg | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Bitaxe Hex
Based on BTC price of $78,178 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Hex edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 92% better power draw (1,100.0 vs 90.0 W). The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Bitaxe Hex actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 300% more hashrate (12.0 vs 3.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Hex 92% better power draw (1,100.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Bitaxe Hex 67% better efficiency (91.7 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Hex 31% better noise (65.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Hex 86% better weight (3.5 vs 0.5 kg)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 1122% more heat output (3,753 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Hex 23% more home mining score (52.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| $350 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$2.21 | Daily net profit | -$0.11 |
| -$1,156 | Net after 1 year | -$438 |
| -$1,962 | Net after 2 years | -$478 |
| -$2,768 | Net after 3 years | -$517 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe HexScore: 64/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Hex30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the Bitaxe Hex?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Hex is more profitable at $-0.11/day compared to $-2.21/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or Bitaxe Hex?
The Bitaxe Hex is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the Bitaxe Hex?
The Bitaxe Hex scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Bitaxe Hex on J/TH?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH while the Bitaxe Hex runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 61.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficiency (91.7 vs 30.0 J/TH).