Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| 88.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 130.0 TH/s |
| 3,344 W | Power Consumption | 3,250 W |
| 38.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 11,410 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 wins on 4 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 34% better efficiency (38.0 vs 25.0 J/TH) in the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 48% more hashrate (88.0 vs 130.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 3% better power draw (3,344 vs 3,250 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 34% better efficiency (38.0 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 13.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 3% more heat output (11,410 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| $596 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$4.83 | Daily net profit | -$3.07 |
| -$2,357 | Net after 1 year | -$1,820 |
| -$4,118 | Net after 2 years | -$2,942 |
| -$5,879 | Net after 3 years | -$4,063 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 is more profitable at $-3.07/day compared to $-4.83/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 13.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficiency (38.0 vs 25.0 J/TH).