Avalon A1346 vs Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1346 | Specification | Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 218.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,662 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 16.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,495 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1346
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T
Based on BTC price of $79,097 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 98% more hashrate (110 vs 218 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T's favour. The Avalon A1346 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1346 and Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 98% more hashrate (110 vs 218 TH/s)
- Avalon A1346 10% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,662 W)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 44% better efficiency (30.0 vs 16.8 J/TH)
- Avalon A1346 17% better weight (12.3 vs 14.9 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 11% more heat output (11,260 vs 12,495 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1346 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1346 | Metric | Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T |
|---|---|---|
| $2,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,525 |
| -$3.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.85 |
| -$4,229 | Net after 1 year | -$2,837 |
| -$5,659 | Net after 2 years | -$3,148 |
| -$7,088 | Net after 3 years | -$3,460 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1346Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1346 or Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T is more profitable at $-0.85/day compared to $-3.92/day for the Avalon A1346. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Avalon A1346 vs Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1346 or the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T?
The Avalon A1346 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1346 and Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T?
The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T runs at 16.8 J/TH — a difference of 13.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 44% better efficiency (30.0 vs 16.8 J/TH).