Avalon A1446 vs Whatsminer M50
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1446 | Specification | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| 135.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 114.0 TH/s |
| 3,310 W | Power Consumption | 3,306 W |
| 24.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 11,294 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,280 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1446
Whatsminer M50
Based on BTC price of $79,088 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1446 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 18% more hashrate (135 vs 114 TH/s). The Whatsminer M50 holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1446 and Whatsminer M50 sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1446 18% more hashrate (135 vs 114 TH/s)
- Avalon A1446 15% better efficiency (24.5 vs 29.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50 2% better weight (12.8 vs 12.5 kg)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Avalon A1446 | Metric | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,600 |
| -$3.03 | Daily net profit | -$3.79 |
| -$4,306 | Net after 1 year | -$3,982 |
| -$5,412 | Net after 2 years | -$5,363 |
| -$6,519 | Net after 3 years | -$6,745 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A144624.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1446 or Whatsminer M50 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1446 is more profitable at $-3.03/day compared to $-3.79/day for the Whatsminer M50. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Avalon A1446 or Whatsminer M50?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1446 or Whatsminer M50?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Avalon A1446 vs Whatsminer M50: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50 runs at 29.0 J/TH — a difference of 4.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficiency (24.5 vs 29.0 J/TH).