Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1566

Avalon A1566

Hashrate 185.0 TH/s Power 3,420 W Efficiency 18.5 J/TH
VS
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S

Hashrate 6.0 TH/s Power 140 W Efficiency 23.3 J/TH

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1566 Specification Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
185.0 TH/s Hashrate 6.0 TH/s
3,420 W Power Consumption 140 W
18.5 J/TH Efficiency 23.3 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 30 dB
14.9 kg Weight 0.9 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 478 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 65/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1566

Daily Revenue 0.00008513 BTC $6.74
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$1.47
Monthly -$44.14
Yearly -$537.01

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S

Daily Revenue 0.00000276 BTC $0.22
Daily Electricity -$0.34
Daily Profit -$0.12
Monthly -$3.53
Yearly -$42.89

Based on BTC price of $79,131 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Both the Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon Nano 3S are closely matched across our scoring factors, with neither holding a decisive advantage. Your choice should depend on your specific priorities — review the specs and profitability analysis above.

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon Nano 3S sit on each measurable spec:

  • Avalon A1566 2983% more hashrate (185.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
  • Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 96% better power draw (3,420 vs 140 W)
  • Avalon A1566 21% better efficiency (18.5 vs 23.3 J/TH)
  • Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 60% better noise (75.0 vs 30.0 dB)
  • Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 94% better weight (14.9 vs 0.9 kg)
  • Avalon A1566 2343% more heat output (11,669 vs 478 BTU/hr)
  • Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 81% more home mining score (36.0 vs 65.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1566 Metric Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
$5,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $145
-$1.47 Daily net profit -$0.12
-$6,037 Net after 1 year -$188
-$6,574 Net after 2 years -$231
-$7,111 Net after 3 years -$274
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Canaan Avalon Nano 3S

Score: 65/100. 30 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1566

18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Avalon A1566 or Canaan Avalon Nano 3S more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is more profitable at $-0.12/day compared to $-1.47/day for the Avalon A1566. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Avalon A1566 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1566 or Canaan Avalon Nano 3S?

The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1566). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S runs at 23.3 J/TH — a difference of 4.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 21% better efficiency (18.5 vs 23.3 J/TH).