Avalon A1346 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1346 | Specification | Canaan Avalon Nano 3S |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 23.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 30 dB |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | 0.9 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 478 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1346
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
Based on BTC price of $79,131 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 96% better power draw (3,300 vs 140 W). That said, the Avalon A1346 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1346 and Canaan Avalon Nano 3S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1346 1733% more hashrate (110.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 96% better power draw (3,300 vs 140 W)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 22% better efficiency (30.0 vs 23.3 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 60% better noise (75.0 vs 30.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 93% better weight (12.3 vs 0.9 kg)
- Avalon A1346 2257% more heat output (11,260 vs 478 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 81% more home mining score (36.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Avalon A1346 | Metric | Canaan Avalon Nano 3S |
|---|---|---|
| $2,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $145 |
| -$3.91 | Daily net profit | -$0.12 |
| -$4,229 | Net after 1 year | -$188 |
| -$5,657 | Net after 2 years | -$231 |
| -$7,086 | Net after 3 years | -$274 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3SScore: 65/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S23.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Avalon A1346 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is more profitable at $-0.12/day compared to $-3.91/day for the Avalon A1346. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1346 or the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Avalon A1346 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1346 or the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1346). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Avalon A1346 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S runs at 23.3 J/TH — a difference of 6.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 22% better efficiency (30.0 vs 23.3 J/TH).