Avalon A1446 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1446 | Specification | Canaan Avalon Nano 3S |
|---|---|---|
| 135.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,310 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| 24.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 23.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 30 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 0.9 kg |
| 11,294 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 478 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1446
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
Based on BTC price of $79,195 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 96% better power draw (3,310 vs 140 W). The Avalon A1446 claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1446 and Canaan Avalon Nano 3S sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1446 2150% more hashrate (135.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 96% better power draw (3,310 vs 140 W)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 5% better efficiency (24.5 vs 23.3 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 60% better noise (75.0 vs 30.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 93% better weight (12.8 vs 0.9 kg)
- Avalon A1446 2264% more heat output (11,294 vs 478 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 81% more home mining score (36.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1446 | Metric | Canaan Avalon Nano 3S |
|---|---|---|
| $3,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $145 |
| -$2.87 | Daily net profit | -$0.11 |
| -$4,248 | Net after 1 year | -$185 |
| -$5,295 | Net after 2 years | -$226 |
| -$6,343 | Net after 3 years | -$266 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3SScore: 65/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S23.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Avalon A1446 or the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is more profitable at $-0.11/day compared to $-2.87/day for the Avalon A1446. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Avalon A1446 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Avalon A1446 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1446 or Canaan Avalon Nano 3S?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1446). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Avalon A1446 and Canaan Avalon Nano 3S on J/TH?
The Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S runs at 23.3 J/TH — a difference of 1.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficiency (24.5 vs 23.3 J/TH).