Canaan Avalon A16 vs Whatsminer M30S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A16 | Specification | Whatsminer M30S |
|---|---|---|
| 282.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 88.0 TH/s |
| 3,900 W | Power Consumption | 3,344 W |
| 13.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 38.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 13,307 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,410 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A16
Whatsminer M30S
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon A16, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 220% more hashrate (282.0 vs 88.0 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A16's favour. The Whatsminer M30S holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan Avalon A16 and Whatsminer M30S sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A16 220% more hashrate (282.0 vs 88.0 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M30S 14% better power draw (3,900 vs 3,344 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16 64% better efficiency (13.8 vs 38.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M30S 23% better weight (14.9 vs 11.5 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A16 17% more heat output (13,307 vs 11,410 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M30S 20% more home mining score (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan Avalon A16 | Metric | Whatsminer M30S |
|---|---|---|
| $4,202 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,500 |
| $0.90 | Daily net profit | -$4.82 |
| -$3,874 | Net after 1 year | -$3,261 |
| -$3,546 | Net after 2 years | -$5,022 |
| -$3,218 | Net after 3 years | -$6,783 |
| Takes ~12.8 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Canaan Avalon A16$5.72/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M30SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1613.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan Avalon A16 or Whatsminer M30S more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16 is more profitable at $0.90/day compared to $-4.82/day for the Whatsminer M30S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon A16 vs Whatsminer M30S: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Canaan Avalon A16 vs Whatsminer M30S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M30S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A16). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan Avalon A16 and Whatsminer M30S on J/TH?
The Canaan Avalon A16 runs at 13.8 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S runs at 38.0 J/TH — a difference of 24.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficiency (13.8 vs 38.0 J/TH).