Canaan Avalon Mini 3 vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon Mini 3 | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| 37.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 130.0 TH/s |
| 800 W | Power Consumption | 3,250 W |
| 21.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| 33 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 8.4 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 2,730 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon Mini 3
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon Mini 3, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 75% better power draw (800 vs 3,250 W). That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 247% more hashrate (37.5 vs 130.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 75% better power draw (800 vs 3,250 W)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 15% better efficiency (21.3 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 36% better weight (8.4 vs 13.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 306% more heat output (2,730 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 195% more home mining score (65.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon Mini 3 | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| $710 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$0.56 | Daily net profit | -$3.07 |
| -$913 | Net after 1 year | -$1,820 |
| -$1,116 | Net after 2 years | -$2,941 |
| -$1,319 | Net after 3 years | -$4,062 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Mini 3Score: 65/100. 33 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Mini 321.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 or Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is more profitable at $-0.56/day compared to $-3.07/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon Mini 3 vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is quieter at 33 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 or the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366?
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 on J/TH?
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 runs at 21.3 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 3.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficiency (21.3 vs 25.0 J/TH).