Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Avalon A1566

Avalon A1566

Hashrate 185.0 TH/s Power 3,420 W Efficiency 18.5 J/TH
VS
Canaan Avalon Mini 3

Canaan Avalon Mini 3

Hashrate 37.5 TH/s Power 800 W Efficiency 21.3 J/TH

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon Mini 3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1566 Specification Canaan Avalon Mini 3
185.0 TH/s Hashrate 37.5 TH/s
3,420 W Power Consumption 800 W
18.5 J/TH Efficiency 21.3 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 33 dB
14.9 kg Weight 8.4 kg
11,669 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,730 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 65/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1566

Daily Revenue 0.00008513 BTC $6.62
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$1.59
Monthly -$47.76
Yearly -$581.08

Canaan Avalon Mini 3

Daily Revenue 0.00001726 BTC $1.34
Daily Electricity -$1.92
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.37
Yearly -$211.30

Based on BTC price of $77,713 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Scored side by side, the Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon Mini 3 trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon Mini 3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Avalon A1566 393% more hashrate (185.0 vs 37.5 TH/s)
  • Canaan Avalon Mini 3 77% better power draw (3,420 vs 800 W)
  • Avalon A1566 13% better efficiency (18.5 vs 21.3 J/TH)
  • Canaan Avalon Mini 3 56% better noise (75.0 vs 33.0 dB)
  • Canaan Avalon Mini 3 44% better weight (14.9 vs 8.4 kg)
  • Avalon A1566 327% more heat output (11,669 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
  • Canaan Avalon Mini 3 81% more home mining score (36.0 vs 65.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Avalon A1566 Metric Canaan Avalon Mini 3
$5,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $710
-$1.59 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$6,081 Net after 1 year -$921
-$6,662 Net after 2 years -$1,133
-$7,243 Net after 3 years -$1,344
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Canaan Avalon Mini 3

Score: 65/100. 33 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1566

18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon Mini 3: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-1.59/day for the Avalon A1566. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1566 or Canaan Avalon Mini 3?

The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is quieter at 33 dB compared to the Avalon A1566 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon Mini 3: which fits a residential setup better?

The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1566). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon Mini 3?

The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 runs at 21.3 J/TH — a difference of 2.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficiency (18.5 vs 21.3 J/TH).