Canaan Avalon Nano 3 vs Ebang Ebit E11++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon Nano 3 | Specification | Ebang Ebit E11++ |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 44.0 TH/s |
| 1,400 W | Power Consumption | 1,980 W |
| 350.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 0.7 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,777 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,756 BTU/hr |
| 66/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Ebang Ebit E11++
Based on BTC price of $79,066 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Ebang Ebit E11++ edges it: 2 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 1000% more hashrate (4.0 vs 44.0 TH/s) in the Ebang Ebit E11++'s favour. That said, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 and Ebang Ebit E11++ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Ebang Ebit E11++ 1000% more hashrate (4.0 vs 44.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 29% better power draw (1,400 vs 1,980 W)
- Ebang Ebit E11++ 87% better efficiency (350.0 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- Ebang Ebit E11++ 41% more heat output (4,777 vs 6,756 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 136% more home mining score (66.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon Nano 3 | Metric | Ebang Ebit E11++ |
|---|---|---|
| $149 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.21 | Daily net profit | -$3.15 |
| -$1,322 | Net after 1 year | -$1,150 |
| -$2,496 | Net after 2 years | -$2,300 |
| -$3,669 | Net after 3 years | -$3,450 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3Score: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Ebang Ebit E11++45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 or the Ebang Ebit E11++?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E11++ is more profitable at $-3.15/day compared to $-3.21/day for the Canaan Avalon Nano 3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 or the Ebang Ebit E11++ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E11++ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 or Ebang Ebit E11++?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Ebang Ebit E11++). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 and Ebang Ebit E11++ on J/TH?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 runs at 350.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E11++ runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 305.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (350.0 vs 45.0 J/TH).