Canaan Avalon Q vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon Q | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 30.0 TH/s |
| 1,674 W | Power Consumption | 2,400 W |
| 18.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 80.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 10.5 kg | Weight | 9,000.0 kg |
| 5,712 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon Q
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T
Based on BTC price of $79,056 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon Q comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 77% better efficiency (18.6 vs 80.0 J/TH) in the Canaan Avalon Q's favour. The Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T claws back ground on price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan Avalon Q and Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon Q 200% more hashrate (90.0 vs 30.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Q 30% better power draw (1,674 vs 2,400 W)
- Canaan Avalon Q 77% better efficiency (18.6 vs 80.0 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Q 100% better weight (10.5 vs 9,000.0 kg)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T 43% more heat output (5,712 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Q 115% more home mining score (56.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan Avalon Q | Metric | Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T |
|---|---|---|
| $1,292 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $200 |
| -$0.64 | Daily net profit | -$4.63 |
| -$1,526 | Net after 1 year | -$1,892 |
| -$1,760 | Net after 2 years | -$3,583 |
| -$1,994 | Net after 3 years | -$5,275 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon QScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Q18.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Canaan Avalon Q or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Q is more profitable at $-0.64/day compared to $-4.63/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Canaan Avalon Q or Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T?
The Canaan Avalon Q is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon Q or Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T?
The Canaan Avalon Q scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan Avalon Q and Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T on J/TH?
The Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T runs at 80.0 J/TH — a difference of 61.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficiency (18.6 vs 80.0 J/TH).
Compare Canaan Avalon Q with...
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator