Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 vs Whatsminer M63
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 | Specification | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| 150.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 360.0 TH/s |
| 3,230 W | Power Consumption | 7,200 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 13.0 kg | Weight | 27.5 kg |
| 11,021 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,566 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466
Whatsminer M63
Based on BTC price of $79,097 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M63 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 140% more hashrate (150 vs 360 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 and Whatsminer M63 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M63 140% more hashrate (150 vs 360 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 55% better power draw (3,230 vs 7,200 W)
- Whatsminer M63 7% better efficiency (21.5 vs 20.0 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 53% better weight (13.0 vs 27.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M63 123% more heat output (11,021 vs 24,566 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63 100% more home mining score (22.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 | Metric | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| $937 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $11,000 |
| -$2.29 | Daily net profit | -$4.18 |
| -$1,774 | Net after 1 year | -$12,524 |
| -$2,610 | Net after 2 years | -$14,049 |
| -$3,447 | Net after 3 years | -$15,573 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M6320.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 vs Whatsminer M63: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 is more profitable at $-2.29/day compared to $-4.18/day for the Whatsminer M63. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 or the Whatsminer M63 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M63 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 or Whatsminer M63?
The Whatsminer M63 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 and Whatsminer M63?
The Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63 runs at 20.0 J/TH — a difference of 1.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficiency (21.5 vs 20.0 J/TH).