MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M63
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Specification | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 360.0 TH/s |
| 2,145 W | Power Consumption | 7,200 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 8,550.0 kg | Weight | 27.5 kg |
| 7,319 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,566 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Whatsminer M63
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M63 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 991% more hashrate (33.0 vs 360.0 TH/s). That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M63 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M63 991% more hashrate (33.0 vs 360.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 70% better power draw (2,145 vs 7,200 W)
- Whatsminer M63 69% better efficiency (65.0 vs 20.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M63 100% better weight (8,550.0 vs 27.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M63 236% more heat output (7,319 vs 24,566 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63 69% more home mining score (26.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Metric | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $11,000 |
| -$3.98 | Daily net profit | -$4.54 |
| -$3,953 | Net after 1 year | -$12,657 |
| -$5,405 | Net after 2 years | -$14,313 |
| -$6,858 | Net after 3 years | -$15,970 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M6320.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or Whatsminer M63 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 is more profitable at $-3.98/day compared to $-4.54/day for the Whatsminer M63. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or Whatsminer M63?
The Whatsminer M63 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or the Whatsminer M63?
The Whatsminer M63 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M63?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63 runs at 20.0 J/TH — a difference of 45.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficiency (65.0 vs 20.0 J/TH).