Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

MicroBT Whatsminer D1

MicroBT Whatsminer D1

Hashrate 48.0 TH/s Power 2,200 W Efficiency 45.8 J/TH
VS
MicroBT Whatsminer M10

MicroBT Whatsminer M10

Hashrate 33.0 TH/s Power 2,145 W Efficiency 65.0 J/TH

MicroBT Whatsminer D1 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

MicroBT Whatsminer D1 Specification MicroBT Whatsminer M10
48.0 TH/s Hashrate 33.0 TH/s
2,200 W Power Consumption 2,145 W
45.8 J/TH Efficiency 65.0 J/TH
Noise Level
8,500.0 kg Weight 8,550.0 kg
7,506 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,319 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithm SHA-256
MicroBT Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

MicroBT Whatsminer D1

Daily Revenue 0.00002209 BTC $1.73
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$3.55
Monthly -$106.56
Yearly -$1,296.48

MicroBT Whatsminer M10

Daily Revenue 0.00001519 BTC $1.19
Daily Electricity -$5.15
Daily Profit -$3.96
Monthly -$118.80
Yearly -$1,445.40

Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 3 (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 45% more hashrate (48.0 vs 33.0 TH/s). That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: MicroBT Whatsminer D1 — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 and MicroBT Whatsminer M10 sit on each measurable spec:

  • MicroBT Whatsminer D1 45% more hashrate (48.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M10 3% better power draw (2,200 vs 2,145 W)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer D1 29% better efficiency (45.8 vs 65.0 J/TH)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer D1 1% better weight (8,500 vs 8,550 kg)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer D1 3% more heat output (7,506 vs 7,319 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

MicroBT Whatsminer D1 Metric MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Upfront cost (MSRP) $2,500
-$3.55 Daily net profit -$3.96
-$1,296 Net after 1 year -$3,945
-$2,593 Net after 2 years -$5,391
-$3,889 Net after 3 years -$6,836
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT Whatsminer D1

45.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 or MicroBT Whatsminer M10 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 is more profitable at $-3.55/day compared to $-3.96/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

MicroBT Whatsminer D1 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 or MicroBT Whatsminer M10?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 and MicroBT Whatsminer M10 on J/TH?

The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 runs at 45.8 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH — a difference of 19.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 29% better efficiency (45.8 vs 65.0 J/TH).