MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M3 |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 2,145 W | Power Consumption | 2,000 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 166.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 8,550.0 kg | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 7,319 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
MicroBT Whatsminer M3
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 175% more hashrate (33.0 vs 12.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT Whatsminer M10's favour. The MicroBT Whatsminer M3 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and MicroBT Whatsminer M3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 175% more hashrate (33.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3 7% better power draw (2,145 vs 2,000 W)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 61% better efficiency (65.0 vs 166.7 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3 5% better weight (8,550 vs 8,100 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 7% more heat output (7,319 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3 8% more home mining score (26.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M3 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.96 | Daily net profit | -$4.37 |
| -$3,946 | Net after 1 year | -$1,594 |
| -$5,391 | Net after 2 years | -$3,189 |
| -$6,837 | Net after 3 years | -$4,783 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT Whatsminer M3Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT Whatsminer M1065.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or MicroBT Whatsminer M3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 is more profitable at $-3.96/day compared to $-4.37/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or MicroBT Whatsminer M3?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M3 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and MicroBT Whatsminer M3?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 runs at 166.7 J/TH — a difference of 101.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficiency (65.0 vs 166.7 J/TH).