Bitaxe Supra vs PiAxe
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitaxe Supra | Specification | PiAxe |
|---|---|---|
| 600.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 500.0 GH/s |
| 15 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 30 dB |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 0.2 kg |
| 51 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 70/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitaxe Supra
PiAxe
Based on BTC price of $69,484 and current network difficulty as of Mar 24, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Two affordable open-source miners. The Bitaxe Supra uses a dedicated ASIC chip while the PiAxe takes a different approach to accessible Bitcoin mining.
The Bitaxe Supra offers a more established platform with a wide accessory ecosystem and large community. The PiAxe is an interesting alternative for builders who want a different project. Performance and support favor the Bitaxe.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Supra25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the PiAxe a good alternative to the Bitaxe?
The PiAxe is a fun project for tinkerers, but the Bitaxe Supra has a more mature ecosystem with heatsinks, stands, cases, and community firmware support.
Which has better community support?
The Bitaxe has the larger and more active community by a significant margin, with regular firmware updates and a wide range of third-party accessories.