Baikal BK-D vs Baikal BK-N240
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-D | Specification | Baikal BK-N240 |
|---|---|---|
| 320.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 480.0 KH/s |
| 1,100 W | Power Consumption | 650 W |
| 3,437.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,500.0 kg | Weight | 6,500.0 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,218 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithm | Cryptonight |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-D
Baikal BK-N240
Based on BTC price of $74,306 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the Baikal BK-D offers 100% better efficiency at 3,437.5 J/TH compared to the Baikal BK-N240 at 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-DScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal BK-D3,437.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-D or Baikal BK-N240 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-N240 is more profitable at $-1.56/day compared to $-2.63/day for the Baikal BK-D. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Baikal BK-D or Baikal BK-N240?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Baikal BK-D or Baikal BK-N240?
The Baikal BK-D scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Baikal BK-N240). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-D and Baikal BK-N240?
The Baikal BK-D runs at 3,437.5 J/TH while the Baikal BK-N240 runs at 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,354,163,229.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.