Baikal BK-N vs Baikal BK-N240
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-N | Specification | Baikal BK-N240 |
|---|---|---|
| 40.0 KH/s | Hashrate | 480.0 KH/s |
| 60 W | Power Consumption | 650 W |
| 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 1,800.0 kg | Weight | 6,500.0 kg |
| 205 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,218 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Cryptonight | Algorithm | Cryptonight |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-N
Baikal BK-N240
Based on BTC price of $76,925 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Both the Baikal BK-N and Baikal BK-N240 are closely matched across our scoring factors, with neither holding a decisive advantage. Your choice should depend on your specific priorities — review the specs and profitability analysis above.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Baikal BK-N and Baikal BK-N240 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Baikal BK-N240 1100% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal BK-N 91% better power draw (60.0 vs 650.0 W)
- Baikal BK-N240 10% better efficiency (1,500,000,000 vs 1,354,166,667 J/TH)
- Baikal BK-N 72% better weight (1,800 vs 6,500 kg)
- Baikal BK-N240 983% more heat output (205 vs 2,218 BTU/hr)
- Baikal BK-N 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Baikal BK-N | Metric | Baikal BK-N240 |
|---|---|---|
| $500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.14 | Daily net profit | -$1.56 |
| -$553 | Net after 1 year | -$569 |
| -$605 | Net after 2 years | -$1,139 |
| -$658 | Net after 3 years | -$1,708 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-NScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal BK-N2401,354,166,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Baikal BK-N or the Baikal BK-N240?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-N is more profitable at $-0.14/day compared to $-1.56/day for the Baikal BK-N240. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Baikal BK-N or Baikal BK-N240?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-N or the Baikal BK-N240?
The Baikal BK-N scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Baikal BK-N240). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Baikal BK-N vs Baikal BK-N240: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Baikal BK-N runs at 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH while the Baikal BK-N240 runs at 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH — a difference of 145,833,333.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 10% better efficiency (1,500,000,000 vs 1,354,166,667 J/TH).