Baikal BK-N240 vs Baikal BK-N70
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-N240 | Specification | Baikal BK-N70 |
|---|---|---|
| 480.0 KH/s | Hashrate | 140.0 KH/s |
| 650 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,500.0 kg | Weight | 4,000.0 kg |
| 2,218 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Cryptonight | Algorithm | Cryptonight |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-N240
Baikal BK-N70
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Baikal BK-N240 and Baikal BK-N70 trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Baikal BK-N240 and Baikal BK-N70 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Baikal BK-N240 243% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal BK-N70 63% better power draw (650 vs 240 W)
- Baikal BK-N240 21% better efficiency (1,354,166,667 vs 1,714,285,714 J/TH)
- Baikal BK-N70 38% better weight (6,500 vs 4,000 kg)
- Baikal BK-N240 171% more heat output (2,218 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- Baikal BK-N70 3% more home mining score (30.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Baikal BK-N240 | Metric | Baikal BK-N70 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $597 |
| -$1.56 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$569 | Net after 1 year | -$807 |
| -$1,139 | Net after 2 years | -$1,017 |
| -$1,708 | Net after 3 years | -$1,228 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-N70Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal BK-N2401,354,166,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-N240 or Baikal BK-N70 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-N70 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-1.56/day for the Baikal BK-N240. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Baikal BK-N240 or the Baikal BK-N70 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Baikal BK-N240 vs Baikal BK-N70: which fits a residential setup better?
The Baikal BK-N70 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Baikal BK-N240). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Baikal BK-N240 and Baikal BK-N70 on J/TH?
The Baikal BK-N240 runs at 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH while the Baikal BK-N70 runs at 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH — a difference of 360,119,047.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 21% better efficiency (1,354,166,667 vs 1,714,285,714 J/TH).