Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Baikal BK-G28

Baikal BK-G28

Hashrate 28.0 GH/s Power 1,300 W Efficiency 46,428.6 J/TH
VS
Baikal BK-N70

Baikal BK-N70

Hashrate 140.0 KH/s Power 240 W Efficiency 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH

Baikal BK-G28 vs Baikal BK-N70

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal BK-G28 Specification Baikal BK-N70
28.0 GH/s Hashrate 140.0 KH/s
1,300 W Power Consumption 240 W
46,428.6 J/TH Efficiency 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH
Noise Level
6,550.0 kg Weight 4,000.0 kg
4,436 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm Cryptonight
Baikal Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal BK-G28

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.12
Daily Profit -$3.12
Monthly -$93.57
Yearly -$1,138.43

Baikal BK-N70

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Baikal BK-G28 edges it: 2 of 3 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 19999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Baikal BK-G28's favour. That said, the Baikal BK-N70 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Baikal BK-G28 — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Baikal BK-G28 and Baikal BK-N70 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Baikal BK-G28 19999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal BK-N70 82% better power draw (1,300 vs 240 W)
  • Baikal BK-G28 100% better efficiency (46,429 vs 1,714,285,714 J/TH)
  • Baikal BK-N70 39% better weight (6,550 vs 4,000 kg)
  • Baikal BK-G28 442% more heat output (4,436 vs 819 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Baikal BK-G28 Metric Baikal BK-N70
Upfront cost (MSRP) $597
-$3.12 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$1,138 Net after 1 year -$807
-$2,277 Net after 2 years -$1,017
-$3,415 Net after 3 years -$1,228
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Baikal BK-G28

46,428.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Baikal BK-G28 or Baikal BK-N70 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-N70 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Baikal BK-G28. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Baikal BK-G28 or the Baikal BK-N70 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-G28 or the Baikal BK-N70?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Baikal BK-G28 vs Baikal BK-N70: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Baikal BK-G28 runs at 46,428.6 J/TH while the Baikal BK-N70 runs at 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH — a difference of 1,714,239,285.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (46,429 vs 1,714,285,714 J/TH).