Baikal BK-B vs Baikal BK-N
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-B | Specification | Baikal BK-N |
|---|---|---|
| 160.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 40.0 KH/s |
| 410 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| 2,562.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 3,800.0 kg | Weight | 1,800.0 kg |
| 1,399 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 205 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithm | Cryptonight |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-B
Baikal BK-N
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Baikal BK-B edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 399999900% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal BK-N isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Baikal BK-B and Baikal BK-N sit on each measurable spec:
- Baikal BK-B 399999900% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal BK-N 85% better power draw (410.0 vs 60.0 W)
- Baikal BK-B 100% better efficiency (2,563 vs 1,500,000,000 J/TH)
- Baikal BK-N 53% better weight (3,800 vs 1,800 kg)
- Baikal BK-B 583% more heat output (1,399 vs 205 BTU/hr)
- Baikal BK-N 6% more home mining score (34.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Baikal BK-B | Metric | Baikal BK-N |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $500 |
| -$0.98 | Daily net profit | -$0.14 |
| -$357 | Net after 1 year | -$553 |
| -$714 | Net after 2 years | -$605 |
| -$1,071 | Net after 3 years | -$658 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-NScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal BK-B2,562.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-B or Baikal BK-N more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-N is more profitable at $-0.14/day compared to $-0.98/day for the Baikal BK-B. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Baikal BK-B or the Baikal BK-N better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Baikal BK-B vs Baikal BK-N: which fits a residential setup better?
The Baikal BK-N scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Baikal BK-B). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-B and Baikal BK-N?
The Baikal BK-B runs at 2,562.5 J/TH while the Baikal BK-N runs at 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,499,997,437.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (2,563 vs 1,500,000,000 J/TH).