Baikal BK-D vs Baikal Giant A900
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-D | Specification | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| 320.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 900.0 MH/s |
| 1,100 W | Power Consumption | 270 W |
| 3,437.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,500.0 kg | Weight | 2,550.0 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 921 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithm | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-D
Baikal Giant A900
Based on BTC price of $74,306 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the Baikal BK-D offers 99% better efficiency at 3,437.5 J/TH compared to the Baikal Giant A900 at 300,000.0 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal BK-D3,437.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-D or Baikal Giant A900 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant A900 is more profitable at $-0.65/day compared to $-2.63/day for the Baikal BK-D. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Baikal BK-D or Baikal Giant A900?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Baikal BK-D or Baikal Giant A900?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-D and Baikal Giant A900?
The Baikal BK-D runs at 3,437.5 J/TH while the Baikal Giant A900 runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 296,562.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.