Baikal BK-N70 vs Baikal Giant A900
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-N70 | Specification | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| 140.0 KH/s | Hashrate | 900.0 MH/s |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 270 W |
| 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 4,000.0 kg | Weight | 2,550.0 kg |
| 819 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 921 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Cryptonight | Algorithm | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-N70
Baikal Giant A900
Based on BTC price of $77,935 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Baikal Giant A900 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 3 (efficiency, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 642757% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal BK-N70 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Baikal BK-N70 and Baikal Giant A900 sit on each measurable spec:
- Baikal Giant A900 642757% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal BK-N70 11% better power draw (240 vs 270 W)
- Baikal Giant A900 100% better efficiency (1,714,285,714 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Baikal Giant A900 36% better weight (4,000 vs 2,550 kg)
- Baikal Giant A900 12% more heat output (819 vs 921 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Baikal BK-N70 | Metric | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| $597 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,499 |
| -$0.58 | Daily net profit | -$0.65 |
| -$807 | Net after 1 year | -$2,735 |
| -$1,017 | Net after 2 years | -$2,972 |
| -$1,228 | Net after 3 years | -$3,209 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal Giant A900300,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-N70 or Baikal Giant A900 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-N70 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-0.65/day for the Baikal Giant A900. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Baikal BK-N70 or the Baikal Giant A900 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Baikal BK-N70 vs Baikal Giant A900: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Baikal BK-N70 and Baikal Giant A900 on J/TH?
The Baikal BK-N70 runs at 1,714,285,714.3 J/TH while the Baikal Giant A900 runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,713,985,714.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,714,285,714 vs 300,000 J/TH).