Baikal BK-G28 vs Baikal Giant A900
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-G28 | Specification | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| 28.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 900.0 MH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 270 W |
| 46,428.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,550.0 kg | Weight | 2,550.0 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 921 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-G28
Baikal Giant A900
Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Baikal BK-G28 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 3 (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 3011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Baikal Giant A900 holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Baikal BK-G28 and Baikal Giant A900 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Baikal BK-G28 3011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Giant A900 79% better power draw (1,300 vs 270 W)
- Baikal BK-G28 85% better efficiency (46,429 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Baikal Giant A900 61% better weight (6,550 vs 2,550 kg)
- Baikal BK-G28 382% more heat output (4,436 vs 921 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Baikal BK-G28 | Metric | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,499 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.65 |
| -$1,138 | Net after 1 year | -$2,735 |
| -$2,277 | Net after 2 years | -$2,972 |
| -$3,415 | Net after 3 years | -$3,209 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal BK-G2846,428.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-G28 or Baikal Giant A900 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant A900 is more profitable at $-0.65/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Baikal BK-G28. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Baikal BK-G28 or Baikal Giant A900?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Baikal BK-G28 or Baikal Giant A900?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Baikal BK-G28 and Baikal Giant A900 on J/TH?
The Baikal BK-G28 runs at 46,428.6 J/TH while the Baikal Giant A900 runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 253,571.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficiency (46,429 vs 300,000 J/TH).