Baikal BK-X vs Baikal Giant A900
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-X | Specification | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 900.0 MH/s |
| 630 W | Power Consumption | 270 W |
| 63,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 3,700.0 kg | Weight | 2,550.0 kg |
| 2,150 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 921 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-X
Baikal Giant A900
Based on BTC price of $74,396 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the Baikal BK-X offers 79% better efficiency at 63,000.0 J/TH compared to the Baikal Giant A900 at 300,000.0 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Giant A900Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal BK-X63,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-X or Baikal Giant A900 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant A900 is more profitable at $-0.65/day compared to $-1.51/day for the Baikal BK-X. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Baikal BK-X or Baikal Giant A900?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Baikal BK-X or Baikal Giant A900?
The Baikal Giant A900 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Baikal BK-X). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-X and Baikal Giant A900?
The Baikal BK-X runs at 63,000.0 J/TH while the Baikal Giant A900 runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 237,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.