Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Holic H28

Holic H28

Hashrate 28.0 TH/s Power 2,100 W Efficiency 75.0 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M50S+

Whatsminer M50S+

Hashrate 138.0 TH/s Power 3,276 W Efficiency 23.7 J/TH

Holic H28 vs Whatsminer M50S+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Holic H28 Specification Whatsminer M50S+
28.0 TH/s Hashrate 138.0 TH/s
2,100 W Power Consumption 3,276 W
75.0 J/TH Efficiency 23.7 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
Weight 13.0 kg
7,165 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,178 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Holic Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Holic H28

Daily Revenue 0.00001289 BTC $1.02
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$4.02
Monthly -$120.65
Yearly -$1,467.95

Whatsminer M50S+

Daily Revenue 0.00006351 BTC $5.02
Daily Electricity -$7.86
Daily Profit -$2.84
Monthly -$85.32
Yearly -$1,038.09

Based on BTC price of $79,022 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Whatsminer M50S+ wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 393% more hashrate (28.0 vs 138.0 TH/s). That said, the Holic H28 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Whatsminer M50S+ — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Holic H28 and Whatsminer M50S+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Whatsminer M50S+ 393% more hashrate (28.0 vs 138.0 TH/s)
  • Holic H28 36% better power draw (2,100 vs 3,276 W)
  • Whatsminer M50S+ 68% better efficiency (75.0 vs 23.7 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M50S+ 56% more heat output (7,165 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
  • Whatsminer M50S+ 38% more home mining score (26.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Holic H28 Metric Whatsminer M50S+
Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,500
-$4.02 Daily net profit -$2.84
-$1,468 Net after 1 year -$4,538
-$2,936 Net after 2 years -$5,576
-$4,404 Net after 3 years -$6,614
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M50S+

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M50S+

23.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Holic H28 or the Whatsminer M50S+?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S+ is more profitable at $-2.84/day compared to $-4.02/day for the Holic H28. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Holic H28 or the Whatsminer M50S+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Whatsminer M50S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Holic H28 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Holic H28 vs Whatsminer M50S+: which fits a residential setup better?

The Whatsminer M50S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Holic H28). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Holic H28 vs Whatsminer M50S+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Holic H28 runs at 75.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S+ runs at 23.7 J/TH — a difference of 51.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficiency (75.0 vs 23.7 J/TH).