MicroBT Whatsminer M3 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3X
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M3 | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M3X |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 12.5 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Power Consumption | 2,050 W |
| 166.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 164.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 7,500.0 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,995 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M3
MicroBT Whatsminer M3X
Based on BTC price of $79,096 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 4% more hashrate (12.0 vs 12.5 TH/s). That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 and MicroBT Whatsminer M3X sit on each measurable spec:
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3X 4% more hashrate (12.0 vs 12.5 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3 2% better power draw (2,000 vs 2,050 W)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3X 2% better efficiency (167 vs 164 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3X 7% better weight (8,100 vs 7,500 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3X 3% more heat output (6,824 vs 6,995 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3 8% more home mining score (28.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M3 | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M3X |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $350 |
| -$4.36 | Daily net profit | -$4.47 |
| -$1,593 | Net after 1 year | -$1,980 |
| -$3,185 | Net after 2 years | -$3,609 |
| -$4,778 | Net after 3 years | -$5,239 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT Whatsminer M3Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT Whatsminer M3X164.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M3 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3X: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 is more profitable at $-4.36/day compared to $-4.47/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 or MicroBT Whatsminer M3X?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M3 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
MicroBT Whatsminer M3 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3X: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M3 runs at 166.7 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X runs at 164.0 J/TH — a difference of 2.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficiency (167 vs 164 J/TH).