Whatsminer M50S+ vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Whatsminer M50S+ | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 |
|---|---|---|
| 138.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 262.0 TH/s |
| 3,276 W | Power Consumption | 3,799 W |
| 23.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 13.0 kg | Weight | 25.5 kg |
| 11,178 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,962 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Whatsminer M50S+
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
Based on BTC price of $79,022 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 90% more hashrate (138 vs 262 TH/s). That said, the Whatsminer M50S+ isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Whatsminer M50S+ and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 90% more hashrate (138 vs 262 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 14% better power draw (3,276 vs 3,799 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 39% better efficiency (23.7 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 49% better weight (13.0 vs 25.5 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 16% more heat output (11,178 vs 12,962 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 20% more home mining score (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Whatsminer M50S+ | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.84 | Daily net profit | $0.41 |
| -$4,538 | Net after 1 year | +$150 |
| -$5,576 | Net after 2 years | +$299 |
| -$6,614 | Net after 3 years | +$449 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72$3.25/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50S+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7214.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Whatsminer M50S+ or MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is more profitable at $0.41/day compared to $-2.84/day for the Whatsminer M50S+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Whatsminer M50S+ or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Whatsminer M50S+ or MicroBT WhatsMiner M72?
The Whatsminer M50S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Whatsminer M50S+ vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Whatsminer M50S+ runs at 23.7 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 9.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 39% better efficiency (23.7 vs 14.5 J/TH).