Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KD2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell KD2 |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 830 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 138.3 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 7,300.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,832 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell KD2
Based on BTC price of $76,896 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KD2 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 11111011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell KD2 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell KD2 11111011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 36% better power draw (530 vs 830 W)
- Goldshell KD2 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 138 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 7,300.0 kg)
- Goldshell KD2 57% more heat output (1,808 vs 2,832 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 132% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell KD2 |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $828 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$1.78 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$1,478 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$2,127 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$2,777 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD2138.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell KD2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-1.78/day for the Goldshell KD2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell KD2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KD2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell KD2?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell KD2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell KD2?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell KD2 runs at 138.3 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,676.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 138 J/TH).