Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell KD2 |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 830 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 138.3 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 7,300.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,832 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell KD2
Based on BTC price of $76,912 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD2 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 138 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KD2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD2 1666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD2 75% better power draw (3,300 vs 830 W)
- Goldshell KD2 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 138 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 100% better weight (13.5 vs 7,300.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 298% more heat output (11,260 vs 2,832 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 79% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell KD2 |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $828 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$1.78 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$1,478 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$2,127 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$2,777 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD2138.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell KD2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD2 is more profitable at $-1.78/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell KD2?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell KD2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell KD2?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell KD2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KD2?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KD2 runs at 138.3 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,528.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 138 J/TH).