Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell KD2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Specification | Goldshell KD2 |
|---|---|---|
| 44.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 460 W | Consommation électrique | 830 W |
| 10,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 138.3 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 7,300.0 kg |
| 1,570 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,832 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh
Goldshell KD2
Based on BTC price of $76,896 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell KD2 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 13636264% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell KD2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD2 13636264% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 45% better power draw (460 vs 830 W)
- Goldshell KD2 100% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 138 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 100% better weight (2.6 vs 7,300.0 kg)
- Goldshell KD2 80% more heat output (1,570 vs 2,832 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 146% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Metric | Goldshell KD2 |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $828 |
| -$1.10 | Daily net profit | -$1.78 |
| -$523 | Net after 1 year | -$1,478 |
| -$926 | Net after 2 years | -$2,127 |
| -$1,329 | Net after 3 years | -$2,777 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44MhScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD2138.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or the Goldshell KD2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is more profitable at $-1.10/day compared to $-1.78/day for the Goldshell KD2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or Goldshell KD2?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KD2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or Goldshell KD2?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell KD2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell KD2 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh runs at 10,454,545.5 J/TH while the Goldshell KD2 runs at 138.3 J/TH — a difference of 10,454,407.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 138 J/TH).