Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KD6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell KD6 |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 29.2 TH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 2,630 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 90.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,974 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell KD6
Based on BTC price of $77,087 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KD6, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 54073974% more hashrate (0.0 vs 29.2 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX II claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell KD6 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD6 54073974% more hashrate (0.0 vs 29.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 80% better power draw (530 vs 2,630 W)
- Goldshell KD6 100% better efficacité (9,814,814.8 vs 90.1 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell KD6 396% more heat output (1,808 vs 8,974 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 195% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell KD6 |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,027 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$5.28 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$2,953 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$4,879 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$6,804 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD690.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KD6: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Goldshell KD6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell KD6?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KD6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell KD6?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell KD6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell KD6?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell KD6 runs at 90.1 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,724.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,814,814.8 vs 90.1 J/TH).