Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell KD6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell KD6 |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 29.2 TH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 2,630 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 90.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,974 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell KD6
Based on BTC price of $76,912 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KD6 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 78918819% more hashrate (0.0 vs 29.2 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell KD6 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell KD6 78918819% more hashrate (0.0 vs 29.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 86% better power draw (360 vs 2,630 W)
- Goldshell KD6 100% better efficacité (9,729,729.7 vs 90.1 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 100% better weight (2.3 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell KD6 631% more heat output (1,228 vs 8,974 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 214% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell KD6 |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,027 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$5.28 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$2,954 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$4,880 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$6,807 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD690.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell KD6: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Goldshell KD6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell KD6: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KD6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell KD6: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell KD6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell KD6?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KD6 runs at 90.1 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,639.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,729.7 vs 90.1 J/TH).