Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell KD6 |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 29.2 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 2,630 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 90.1 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,974 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell KD6
Based on BTC price of $76,844 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD6 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (5,925,925.9 vs 90.1 J/TH) in the Goldshell KD6's favour. The Goldshell AE Max II holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KD6 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell KD6 5407307% more hashrate (0.0 vs 29.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD6 18% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,630 W)
- Goldshell KD6 100% better efficacité (5,925,925.9 vs 90.1 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 22% more heat output (10,918 vs 8,974 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 32% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell KD6 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,027 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$5.28 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$2,954 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$4,881 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$6,808 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD690.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD6: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD6 is more profitable at $-5.28/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell KD6?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell KD6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell KD6?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell KD6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD6: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell KD6 runs at 90.1 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,835.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (5,925,925.9 vs 90.1 J/TH).