Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell KD5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell KD5 |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 18.0 TH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 2,250 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 125.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,677 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell KD5
Based on BTC price of $77,087 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD5 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 48648549% more hashrate (0.0 vs 18.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell KD5's favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell KD5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD5 48648549% more hashrate (0.0 vs 18.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 84% better power draw (360 vs 2,250 W)
- Goldshell KD5 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 125 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 100% better weight (2.3 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell KD5 525% more heat output (1,228 vs 7,677 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 165% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell KD5 |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,998 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$4.76 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$3,736 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$5,474 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$7,212 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD5125.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell KD5?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-4.76/day for the Goldshell KD5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell KD5?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KD5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell KD5?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell KD5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell KD5?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KD5 runs at 125.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,604.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 125 J/TH).