Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell KD-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.6 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 205 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 128.1 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 700 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell KD-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,896 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KD-BOX, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 128 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max II claws back ground on niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KD-BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD-BOX 296196% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX 94% better power draw (3,200 vs 205 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 128 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 1461% more heat output (10,918 vs 700 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD-BOX 7% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell KD-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $330 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.44 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$489 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$648 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$807 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD-BOXScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX128.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX is more profitable at $-0.44/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD-BOX: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell KD-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell KD-BOX?
The Goldshell KD-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KD-BOX?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell KD-BOX runs at 128.1 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,797.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 128 J/TH).