Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell KD-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell KD-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.6 TH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 205 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 128.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | — |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 700 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell KD-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,912 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD-BOX comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 128 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell KD-BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell KD-BOX 4324224% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX 43% better power draw (360 vs 205 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 128 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 76% more heat output (1,228 vs 700 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 123% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell KD-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $330 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.44 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$489 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$648 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$807 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX128.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell KD-BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX is more profitable at $-0.44/day compared to $-0.86/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell KD-BOX: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KD-BOX at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell KD-BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell KD-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell KD-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KD-BOX runs at 128.1 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,601.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 128 J/TH).