Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE vs Antminer AL1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE | Specification | Antminer AL1 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,360 W |
| 250.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 210.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 5.0 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,464 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE
Antminer AL1
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE et le Antminer AL1 sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE and Antminer AL1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer AL1 700% more hashrate (2.0 vs 16.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE 85% better power draw (500 vs 3,360 W)
- Antminer AL1 16% better efficacité (250 vs 210 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE 40% better noise (45.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE 66% better weight (5.0 vs 14.5 kg)
- Antminer AL1 572% more heat output (1,706 vs 11,464 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE 72% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE | Metric | Antminer AL1 |
|---|---|---|
| $538 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $10,000 |
| -$1.13 | Daily net profit | -$7.49 |
| -$950 | Net after 1 year | -$12,733 |
| -$1,361 | Net after 2 years | -$15,466 |
| -$1,773 | Net after 3 years | -$18,199 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer AL1210.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE vs Antminer AL1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE vs Antminer AL1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer AL1 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE or the Antminer AL1?
The Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer AL1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE and Antminer AL1 on J/TH?
The Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH while the Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH — a difference of 40.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficacité (250 vs 210 J/TH).