Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) vs Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 119.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1,770.0 GH/s |
| 1,566 W | Consommation électrique | 2,839 W |
| 13,159.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,604.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 7,500.0 kg | Weight | 16.1 kg |
| 5,343 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,687 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 1387% more hashrate (0.1 vs 1.8 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) and Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 1387% more hashrate (0.1 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) 45% better power draw (1,566 vs 2,839 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 88% better efficacité (13,160 vs 1,604 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 100% better weight (7,500.0 vs 16.1 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 81% more heat output (5,343 vs 9,687 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) 27% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,030 |
| -$3.75 | Daily net profit | -$6.75 |
| -$1,370 | Net after 1 year | -$3,494 |
| -$2,741 | Net after 2 years | -$5,957 |
| -$4,111 | Net after 3 years | -$8,421 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)1,604.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) vs Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) is more profitable at $-3.75/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) or the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) vs Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh): which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) vs Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) runs at 13,159.7 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) runs at 1,604.0 J/TH — a difference of 11,555.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 88% better efficacité (13,160 vs 1,604 J/TH).