Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Bitmain ANTMINER DR7
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) | Specification | Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 |
|---|---|---|
| 34.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 127.0 TH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 2,730 W |
| 52.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 9,400.0 kg | Weight | 1.6 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,315 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithme | Blake256r14 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)
Bitmain ANTMINER DR7
Based on BTC price of $76,885 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 274% more hashrate (34.0 vs 127.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) and Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 274% more hashrate (34.0 vs 127.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 34% better power draw (1,800 vs 2,730 W)
- Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 59% better efficacité (52.9 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 100% better weight (9,400.0 vs 1.6 kg)
- Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 52% more heat output (6,142 vs 9,315 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) | Metric | Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,639 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$2.06 |
| -$3,238 | Net after 1 year | -$2,390 |
| -$4,375 | Net after 2 years | -$3,142 |
| -$5,513 | Net after 3 years | -$3,893 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain ANTMINER DR7Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain ANTMINER DR721.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) or the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 is more profitable at $-2.06/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Bitmain ANTMINER DR7: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Bitmain ANTMINER DR7: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Bitmain ANTMINER DR7: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) runs at 52.9 J/TH while the Bitmain ANTMINER DR7 runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 31.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficacité (52.9 vs 21.5 J/TH).