Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Specification | iPollo V1 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.6 GH/s |
| 2,556 W | Consommation électrique | 3,100 W |
| 1,065,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 861,111.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 13,000.0 kg |
| 8,721 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)
iPollo V1
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo V1, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 50% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iPollo V1's favour. The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and iPollo V1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iPollo V1 50% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 18% better power draw (2,556 vs 3,100 W)
- iPollo V1 19% better efficacité (1,065,000 vs 861,111 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 8% better weight (14,200 vs 13,000 kg)
- iPollo V1 21% more heat output (8,721 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Metric | iPollo V1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,699 |
| -$6.13 | Daily net profit | -$7.44 |
| -$3,239 | Net after 1 year | -$4,415 |
| -$5,478 | Net after 2 years | -$7,130 |
| -$7,717 | Net after 3 years | -$9,846 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1861,111.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) or iPollo V1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) is more profitable at $-6.13/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V1: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V1: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and iPollo V1 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) runs at 1,065,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH — a difference of 203,888.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 19% better efficacité (1,065,000 vs 861,111 J/TH).