Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 17.7 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) et le Iceriver KS3M sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KS3M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 57% more hashrate (9.4 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS3M 3% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 34% better efficacité (372 vs 567 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS3M 3% better weight (17.7 vs 17.1 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 3% more heat output (11,942 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS3M 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$5,443 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$8,385 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$11,328 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS3MScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)372.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs Iceriver KS3M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS3M is more profitable at $-7.94/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or Iceriver KS3M?
The Iceriver KS3M is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or Iceriver KS3M?
The Iceriver KS3M scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KS3M?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 194.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficacité (372 vs 567 J/TH).