Antminer KS5 vs IceRiver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS5 | Specification | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 GH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 76 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS5
IceRiver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer KS5 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 19900% more hashrate (20.0 vs 0.1 TH/s) in the Antminer KS5's favour. The IceRiver KS0 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer KS5 and IceRiver KS0 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer KS5 19900% more hashrate (20.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 98% better power draw (3,000.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Antminer KS5 77% better efficacité (150 vs 650 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 54% better noise (76.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 84% better weight (15.8 vs 2.5 kg)
- Antminer KS5 4515% more heat output (10,236 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 145% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer KS5 | Metric | IceRiver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $12,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$6.48 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$14,365 | Net after 1 year | -$155 |
| -$16,730 | Net after 2 years | -$210 |
| -$19,095 | Net after 3 years | -$266 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS5150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer KS5 or the IceRiver KS0?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-6.48/day for the Antminer KS5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer KS5 or IceRiver KS0?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Antminer KS5 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer KS5 or IceRiver KS0?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Antminer KS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer KS5 and IceRiver KS0 on J/TH?
The Antminer KS5 runs at 150.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 500.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (150 vs 650 J/TH).