Antminer KS5 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS5 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 400.0 GH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 76 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS5
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Antminer KS5 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer KS5 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer KS5 4900% more hashrate (20.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% better power draw (3,000 vs 100 W)
- Antminer KS5 40% better efficacité (150 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 54% better noise (76.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 84% better weight (15.8 vs 2.5 kg)
- Antminer KS5 2900% more heat output (10,236 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 145% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer KS5 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $12,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $77 |
| -$6.48 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$14,365 | Net after 1 year | -$159 |
| -$16,730 | Net after 2 years | -$242 |
| -$19,095 | Net after 3 years | -$324 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS5150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer KS5 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-6.48/day for the Antminer KS5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer KS5 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Antminer KS5 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer KS5 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Antminer KS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer KS5 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer KS5 runs at 150.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 100.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficacité (150 vs 250 J/TH).