Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Elphapex DG2 Mini
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) | Specification | Elphapex DG2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| 504.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.4 GH/s |
| 800 W | Consommation électrique | 530 W |
| 1,587,301.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 220,833.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 4.5 kg |
| 2,730 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,808 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)
Elphapex DG2 Mini
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Elphapex DG2 Mini comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 86% better efficacité (1,587,302 vs 220,833 J/TH). That said, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) and Elphapex DG2 Mini actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Elphapex DG2 Mini 376% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Elphapex DG2 Mini 34% better power draw (800 vs 530 W)
- Elphapex DG2 Mini 86% better efficacité (1,587,302 vs 220,833 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG2 Mini 100% better weight (4,400.0 vs 4.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) 51% more heat output (2,730 vs 1,808 BTU/hr)
- Elphapex DG2 Mini 93% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) | Metric | Elphapex DG2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| $165 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $999 |
| -$1.92 | Daily net profit | -$1.27 |
| -$866 | Net after 1 year | -$1,463 |
| -$1,567 | Net after 2 years | -$1,927 |
| -$2,267 | Net after 3 years | -$2,392 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Elphapex DG2 MiniScore: 58/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG2 Mini220,833.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) or the Elphapex DG2 Mini?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Elphapex DG2 Mini is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-1.92/day for the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) or Elphapex DG2 Mini?
The Elphapex DG2 Mini is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Elphapex DG2 Mini: which fits a residential setup better?
The Elphapex DG2 Mini scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) and Elphapex DG2 Mini on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH while the Elphapex DG2 Mini runs at 220,833.3 J/TH — a difference of 1,366,468.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (1,587,302 vs 220,833 J/TH).