Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Whatsminer M50S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Whatsminer M50S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 160.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 3,520 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 22.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,010 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Whatsminer M50S++
Based on BTC price of $76,991 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Whatsminer M50S++ trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Whatsminer M50S++ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M50S++ 1043% more hashrate (14.0 vs 160.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 62% better power draw (1,350 vs 3,520 W)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 77% better efficacité (96.4 vs 22.0 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 56% better weight (6.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 161% more heat output (4,606 vs 12,010 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 97% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Whatsminer M50S++ |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,000 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$2.78 |
| -$1,351 | Net after 1 year | -$5,014 |
| -$2,352 | Net after 2 years | -$6,029 |
| -$3,354 | Net after 3 years | -$7,043 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S++22.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Whatsminer M50S++ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-2.78/day for the Whatsminer M50S++. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Whatsminer M50S++?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Whatsminer M50S++ at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Whatsminer M50S++?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Whatsminer M50S++). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Whatsminer M50S++ on J/TH?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S++ runs at 22.0 J/TH — a difference of 74.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (96.4 vs 22.0 J/TH).