Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) vs Whatsminer M53S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M53S |
|---|---|---|
| 28.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 260.0 TH/s |
| 1,596 W | Consommation électrique | 6,760 W |
| 57.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 7,000.0 kg | Weight | 27.5 kg |
| 5,446 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 23,065 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th)
Whatsminer M53S
Based on BTC price of $76,965 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M53S, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 829% more hashrate (28.0 vs 260.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) and Whatsminer M53S sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M53S 829% more hashrate (28.0 vs 260.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) 76% better power draw (1,596 vs 6,760 W)
- Whatsminer M53S 54% better efficacité (57.0 vs 26.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M53S 100% better weight (7,000.0 vs 27.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M53S 324% more heat output (5,446 vs 23,065 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M53S 57% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M53S |
|---|---|---|
| $5,599 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,500 |
| -$2.84 | Daily net profit | -$7.02 |
| -$6,635 | Net after 1 year | -$11,061 |
| -$7,671 | Net after 2 years | -$13,621 |
| -$8,707 | Net after 3 years | -$16,182 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M53SScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M53S26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) or the Whatsminer M53S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) is more profitable at $-2.84/day compared to $-7.02/day for the Whatsminer M53S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) vs Whatsminer M53S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M53S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) or the Whatsminer M53S?
The Whatsminer M53S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) and Whatsminer M53S?
The Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) runs at 57.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M53S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 31.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficacité (57.0 vs 26.0 J/TH).