Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Antminer S19 Hydro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Specification | Antminer S19 Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 158.0 TH/s |
| 2,385 W | Consommation électrique | 5,451 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 34.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 15.2 kg |
| 8,138 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,599 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)
Antminer S19 Hydro
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19 Hydro comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 198% more hashrate (53.0 vs 158.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Antminer S19 Hydro sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S19 Hydro 198% more hashrate (53.0 vs 158.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 56% better power draw (2,385 vs 5,451 W)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 23% better efficacité (45.0 vs 34.5 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 15.2 kg)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 129% more heat output (8,138 vs 18,599 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 69% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Metric | Antminer S19 Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| $274 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,000 |
| -$3.85 | Daily net profit | -$7.49 |
| -$1,679 | Net after 1 year | -$7,734 |
| -$3,083 | Net after 2 years | -$10,468 |
| -$4,488 | Net after 3 years | -$13,203 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 HydroScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 Hydro34.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Antminer S19 Hydro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) is more profitable at $-3.85/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer S19 Hydro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Antminer S19 Hydro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer S19 Hydro is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or Antminer S19 Hydro?
The Antminer S19 Hydro scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Antminer S19 Hydro on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Antminer S19 Hydro runs at 34.5 J/TH — a difference of 10.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 23% better efficacité (45.0 vs 34.5 J/TH).