Antminer S19 Hydro vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 Hydro | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 |
|---|---|---|
| 158.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 115.0 TH/s |
| 5,451 W | Consommation électrique | 3,500 W |
| 34.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.4 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.2 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 18,599 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 Hydro
Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 36% better power draw (5,451 vs 3,500 W) in the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326's favour. That said, the Antminer S19 Hydro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S19 Hydro and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer S19 Hydro 37% more hashrate (158 vs 115 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 36% better power draw (5,451 vs 3,500 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 12% better efficacité (34.5 vs 30.4 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 14% better weight (15.2 vs 13.0 kg)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 56% more heat output (18,599 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 Hydro 22% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S19 Hydro | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $609 |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$4.33 |
| -$7,734 | Net after 1 year | -$2,190 |
| -$10,468 | Net after 2 years | -$3,770 |
| -$13,203 | Net after 3 years | -$5,351 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 HydroScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner A132630.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S19 Hydro vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 is more profitable at $-4.33/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer S19 Hydro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer S19 Hydro or Canaan AvalonMiner A1326?
The Antminer S19 Hydro is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19 Hydro or the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326?
The Antminer S19 Hydro scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S19 Hydro vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S19 Hydro runs at 34.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 runs at 30.4 J/TH — a difference of 4.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficacité (34.5 vs 30.4 J/TH).